Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

To: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:51:24 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87o9ze952b.fsf@rover.gag.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 6372173.rhYApjaNVB@kitterma-e6430>
References: <[🔎] 20170110020819.h7dyrqxvywotn22r@hephaestus.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 3194402.efPJBb10Cu@kitterma-e6430> <[🔎] 87tw97mrud.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] 6372173.rhYApjaNVB@kitterma-e6430>

Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> writes:

> I don't think we should be monkeying with the Social Contract to solve a non-
> problem.

I agree.

Bdale

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread