Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
From: Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 07:30:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] slrno78vrv.3ff.jmm@inutil.org>
References: <[🔎] 20170110020819.h7dyrqxvywotn22r@hephaestus.silentflame.com> <[🔎] 3194402.efPJBb10Cu@kitterma-e6430> <[🔎] 87tw97mrud.fsf@hope.eyrie.org> <[🔎] 6372173.rhYApjaNVB@kitterma-e6430>

Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> wrote:
> Has anyone ever 
> seriously questioned the appropriateness of the Security Team's practices 
> based on the Social Contract?

Not in the last 11 years since I'm around. If that came up before, Martin or
Wichert should know.

> I don't think we should be monkeying with the Social Contract to solve a non-
> problem.

Agreed.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi>

References:
- Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
- Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by Date: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Next by thread: Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread