On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:27:31AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > * Whatever else people come up. Require that whoever starts a thread on -private that doesn't have [VAC] in the subject, explicitly states the privacy concerns on the message[1], and disclose accordingly. This could be implemented via other subject tags other than [VAC]. [CUSTOM] could refer to a non-standard situation explained in the mail. Replies to the thread follow the same disclosure policy as the message that started the thread, unless they change the subject tag. The only reply allowed to a message without subject tag is to request a resend with the subject tag. [1] For example: - [KEY] keysigning request: can be forwarded to DDs living in that area - [RETIRE] retiring from Debian: the act of retirement will be disclosed anyway by a keyring change, the reason can be disclosed only if specifically stated - [PERSONAL] private life (of self or another person): only to be disclosed to official biographers - [SEC] security sensitive early discussion: disclose once the threat level is clear - [SNITCH] message contains information acquired from private conversation with X and Y: disclose only after they ACK it - [FUU] message written unthinkingly by instinct, and posted on -private to avoid making a fool of oneself on lists that are publicly archived forever: do not forward message to list and ask a friend to have a quiet word in front of a drink Enrico -- GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature