Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:52:00PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
>> I'm very close to seconding it. However, I wonder why, in the second phrase,
>> you're restricting the process of objecting to declassification to a GR.
> Oh, I think there might be an ambiguity here. I am interpreting Don's
> text as saying that DDs should be able to object *to the process* via a
> GR; whereas Nicolas (and possibly Iain) seem to be interpreting it as
> saying that DDs should be able to object to individual declassification
> actions via a GR.
To datapoint, I interpreted it as the latter as well.
With the clarification that Don intended the former, I would second this.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: