Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Hubert Chathi writes ("Re: Tentative summary of the amendments"):
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:09:18 -0700, Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> said:
> > I believe Ian's intended reading is that a package that depends on
> > uselessd | systemd (but does not work with sysvinit) would be allowed
> > by his proposal.
> 
> I would hope that this would not be allowed by Ian's proposal until
> uselessd is also in Debian.  In particular, "work with one alternative
> init system", I think, *should* imply that the alternative init system
> is in Debian.

Yes; I didn't spell that out because I thought it would be obvious.
By `in Debian' in this context we probably mean `in testing and not RC
buggy'.

Ian.