Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

[Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>]

Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> writes:
> Q2: support for alternative init systems as PID 1
> =================================================
> A2.1: packages MUST work with one alternative init system (in [iwj])
> (if you are confused with “one” here, it’s basically fine to read it as
> “sysvinit” instead. See [10]this subthread for a discussion about
> this)

I believe Ian's intended reading is that a package that depends on
uselessd | systemd (but does not work with sysvinit) would be allowed by
his proposal.

Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«