Re: [Sorry Neil] Wording modification of the The ???no GR, please??? amendement.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 07:45:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our Contitution.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the procedures
> for decision making and conflict resolution are working adequately and thus
> a General Resolution is not required.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seconded.
Cheers,
aj
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=JjLk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: