Charles Plessy wrote: > I propose the following replacement as per article A.1.5 of our > Contitution. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing > General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the > outcome of the vote. > > Regarding the subject of this ballot, the Project affirms that the > procedures for decision making and conflict resolution are working > adequately and thus a General Resolution is not required. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I don't suppose it's necessary, but since that perfectly fits my thoughts on this subject: Seconded. Thank you for your efforts on this, and especially for this improved wording. Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
pgpG2V6jfanYs.pgp
Description: PGP signature