On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 08:14:44AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le lundi, 20 octobre 2014, 12.17:14 Neil McGovern a écrit : > > > > Ian's: make each package support all alternative init systems > > > > > > This is actively misleading in a least four ways: > > Yup, I wouldn't count that as neutral either. How about: > > Your two proposals don't seem to match "Ian's" to which you're > responding: > > > Packages should continue to run under sysvinit unless technically > > unfeasible > > Ian's doesn't mention sysvinit at all; this would be highly misleading. > > > Packages may require a specific init system if technically required > > That's not at all the core of "Ian's" proposal in my reading. > That's because they're descriptions for Lucas' amendment. Neil --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature