Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

[Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>]

>>>>> "Joey" == Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:

    Joey> Why not just make your proposal be something along the lines
    Joey> of reaffirming the technical decision-making process as it
    Joey> currently stands, from the package maintainers, to the policy,
    Joey> to the TC.  It could implicitly or explicitly reaffirm both
    Joey> recent TC decisions on init systems.

I'd support very strongly something like this, no more than one or two
more paragraphs like the above.