Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

[Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>]

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:
> David Weinehall writes ("Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory"):
>> OK, so packaging uselessd (thus providing another init system that
>> provides -- most of -- the systemd interfaces) would solve all your
>> worries?
>
> This resolution will be interpreted by humans, specifically individual
> maintainers, the TC, and the release team - not by robots.

Presumably some maintainers would consider uselessd an alternate init
system - and others will not. In that case the GR seems have achieved
effectively nothing.


Best,
-Nikolaus
-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«