Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

David Weinehall writes ("Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory"):
> OK, so packaging uselessd (thus providing another init system that
> provides -- most of -- the systemd interfaces) would solve all your
> worries?

This resolution will be interpreted by humans, specifically individual
maintainers, the TC, and the release team - not by robots.

Ian.