Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

To: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:38:57 +0530
Message-id: <544114E9.6080003@researchut.com>
Reply-to: rrs@researchut.com
In-reply-to: <CABpYwDWoejUKybVpJk=QZz1J1D6HoZK20G-MrmVfH5gg4BV3Og@mail.gmail.com>
References: <21567.57029.724173.958520@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <21568.2030.594087.481240@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <1413484103.2260.10.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk> <201410162041.54763.holger@layer-acht.org> <5440D822.4060008@researchut.com> <20141017114020.GB5728@bkor.dhs.org> <5441114A.3040002@researchut.com> <CABpYwDWoejUKybVpJk=QZz1J1D6HoZK20G-MrmVfH5gg4BV3Og@mail.gmail.com>

On Friday 17 October 2014 06:27 PM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:

On 17 October 2014 15:53, Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com> wrote:

> Why is SysV Init so unacceptable ? It is a neutral init that serves well
> for all our sub-projects. Let that be the default choice.

Please do not conflate two very different issues. The default choice
has been decided and is not in question at this point. This is about
ensuring that SysV init (among others) is and continues to be a
*possible* choice for a user.

It would be nice to know what "possible" is defined as.

-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Olav Vitters <olav@vitters.nl>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>
- Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
  - From: Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Next by Date: Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory
Previous by thread: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Next by thread: Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread