[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory



On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/10/14 at 11:38 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 09:44:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >    For the jessie release, all software that currently supports being run
> > >    under sysvinit should continue to support sysvinit unless there is no
> > >    technically feasible way to do so.
> > 
> > I believe "currently" needs to be clarified - are you talking about the
> > current state of jessie, of wheezy, or something else?
> 
> I tried to keep changes from the original text (as voted on by the TC)
> to the bare minimum.
> But, since the intend here is to allow swift upgrades between stable
> releases, it should read:
> 
>   For the jessie release, all software available in Debian 'wheezy' that
>   supports being run under sysvinit should continue to support sysvinit
>   unless there is no technically feasible way to do so.
> 

Hi Lucas,

For clarity, are you formally amending your own text here?

Neil
-- 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: