On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:05:11AM +0000, Anthony Towns wrote: > If it's just unclear, maybe adding "with the first expiry not > occurring until Dec 31st 2015" to the transition statement would help? If there is a strong desire to clarify the language further, I wouldn't mind formally accepting the above as an amendment. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature