Hi! I've been looking at the tally sheet for gr_initcoupling to try to get a bit more understanding of the lines in the project. I'm not sure I've managed to achieve that, but I thought I could share some stats anyway. To start, there were 483 voters on 1006 voting developers. More than half didn't vote. Because the nominative tally sheet? Plain business? So fed up that it doesn't matter anymore? As first choices, we have: 253 Option 4 General Resolution is not required for 50, FD follows as 2nd choice 119 Option 1 Packages may not (in general) require a specific init system for 30, FD follows as 2nd choice 64 Option 2 Support for other init systems is recommended, but not mandatory 60 Option 3 Packages may require specific init systems if maintainers decide 12 Option 5 Further Discussion 108 voters prefer any option rather than further discussion (FD is ranked last). 86 voters expressed that this GR was needed (FD not as first choice but ranked above option 4). I was under the impresion that option 2 and option 3 had a close meaning. For 322 voters (66%) that's the case. Option 2 and 3 are either ranked at the same level or one follow the other. Attached is a crude Ruby script. (To be consider public domain and bad code.) -- Lunar .''`. lunar@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-
Attachment:
gr_initcoupling.rb
Description: application/ruby
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature