[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate?

On 28 October 2014 12:12, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> This is nice and all, but how to you tell such a “sub-init” which
> services have been already started and which services it has to start
> itself?

The point of a sub-init would be to start one specific service.
Basically the idea would be that in /etc/init.d/gdm3 init script,
instead of starting the gdm daemon, one would start systemd with a
very special set of configurations (possibly even separate and
different from what one would use in a normal, systemd-based startup
of gdm). And on stopping of that service one would stop that whole

Best regards,
    Aigars Mahinovs        mailto:aigarius@debian.org
 | .''`.    Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)            |
 | : :' :   Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv)     |
 | `. `'    Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting   |
 |   `-                                 (http://www.aiteki.com) |

Reply to: