[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:56:33AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> All this talk about what upstream developers will and won't do.
> Seems to me that they've been writing sysvinit scripts for years;
> systemd support ADDS work.  It's only the GNOME developers who are
> being rather vocal about not supporting sysvinit, to the extent of
> IMHO blackmail.

Can you back this up?

1. *Only* the GNOME developers
2. That's it is about sysvinit
3. That we tried to blackmail someone
4. That it is about sysvinit scripts

If you cannot, it seems you just performed libel. Suggest to be very
careful in the claims you make. Actually, I suggest you to cease and

I've been communicating on debian-devel for a very long time. It seems
you missed everything and just make simple minded assumptions. It is ok
to be simple minded and utterly wrong. What is wrong is then to turn
that into calls of "blackmail".

You're so far off it's not funny.


Reply to: