[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems



On Thursday 23 October 2014 06:08 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:55:34AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> > The same applies to many upstream developers, they develop software
>> > mainly for themselves, not the users, see for example the latest
>> > development of Gnome. The only way to change this is by creating a large
>> > enough user group taking side by refusing to use software that is going
>> > in the wrong direction and promote alternatives.
> This is not a "I don't like the GNOME developers" mailing list. "Going
> in the wrong direction": opinion, not fact. Obviously you can use
> something other than GNOME, I'd appreciate not generalizing the hundreds
> people who contribute to GNOME.
>
> Similarly, turning not being able to vote into "Debian doesn't care for
> it's users": You're free to make your case. Convince others.
> That'll probably be appreciated way more than negativity.

What was wrong with Svante's post ? He was just giving an example,
quoting Gnome.
I'd give a similar example for KDE.

We believe Debian is more than just a Desktop. And for Desktop too, more
than just Gnome _or_ KDE.


-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: