[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Joey" == Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> writes:
>     Joey> Why not just make your proposal be something along the lines
>     Joey> of reaffirming the technical decision-making process as it
>     Joey> currently stands, from the package maintainers, to the policy,
>     Joey> to the TC.  It could implicitly or explicitly reaffirm both
>     Joey> recent TC decisions on init systems.
> I'd support very strongly something like this, no more than one or two
> more paragraphs like the above.

I consider Charles Plessy's proposal to do this, more or less.
(Enough that I don't think another proposal would be worthwhile.)

see shy jo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: