Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
Le vendredi, 17 octobre 2014, 19.50:22 Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
> We need the GR to ensure situation stays good. No big deal.
That's the fundamental crux of the disagreement I think: A GR will _not_
automagically generate upstream attention for non-systemd support.
Point.
If your "good" situation is a situation where non-systemd setups
continue to work, what's needed to ensure it stays so is "people putting
up the work everywhere needed", _not_ a GR (which is "people have stated
a collective opinion").
Post-Jessie, trying to coerce sysvinit maintenance burden on maintainers
is directly against §2.1.1 of our constitution; trying to coerce
sysvinit maintenance burden on upstreams will simply not happen, no
matter how many GRs we might pass in that hope.
Cheers,
OdyX
Reply to: