On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:35:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 06:09:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > The usual reasoning for explicitly enumerating things is the thing > > Solveig mentioned about people being (or professing to be) too inept to > > realise what appropriate behaviour is. Personally I do tend to share > > some of the concerns about rules lawyering and evasion with that but > > it's a reasonable view and I suspect you don't win either way. > I could see how a separate document, with an explicit list of "do not"s, > could usefully be linked from the "further reading" section. > I think we should not make such a list authoritative. I definitely agree that the list should at the very least be written to have an "and anything else we find unacceptable" in it which is pretty much the same thing I think.
Description: Digital signature