[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The Code of Conduct needs specifics

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:35:19PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 06:09:25PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > The usual reasoning for explicitly enumerating things is the thing
> > Solveig mentioned about people being (or professing to be) too inept to
> > realise what appropriate behaviour is.  Personally I do tend to share
> > some of the concerns about rules lawyering and evasion with that but
> > it's a reasonable view and I suspect you don't win either way.

> I could see how a separate document, with an explicit list of "do not"s,
> could usefully be linked from the "further reading" section.

> I think we should not make such a list authoritative.

I definitely agree that the list should at the very least be written to
have an "and anything else we find unacceptable" in it which is pretty
much the same thing I think.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: