On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:35:15PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems"): > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:01:16AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > If you're going to say we need to replace "the TC resolution is > > > amended" with something like "we wish that instead the TC had decided > > > blah", then please reconsider. That would force the GR to avoid > > > saying what its own effect is, which is unnecessarily confusing. > > > Also, writing that text is very cumbersome. > > > > The text currently says it's using the TC's power to decide > > something, and so would fall under 4.1.4. I think the intent of > > this GR is not to override the TC's decision about the default, so > > I'm currently not sure what to suggest. > > The TC decision of the 11th of February said: > > Should the project pass a General Resolution before the release of > "jessie" asserting a "position statement about issues of the day" on > init systems, that position replaces the outcome of this vote and is > adopted by the Technical Committee as its own decision. > > This a GR proposal is a "position statement about issues of the day" > (as it says in the "Notes and rubric".) It's on the subject of init > systems. Therefore it is covered by this wording. > > As a consequence, the GR replaces the outcome of the TC vote. The GR > text explicitly adopts the existing TC decision on the default, and > adds to it. Ian, I'm extremely disaspointed in this childish behavior of trying to insert a malicious trap-door to a decision. I'm *EXTREMELY* disaspointed in this. I'm CC'ing DAM. This is, at minimum: 1) A abuse of power (inserting a backdoor in a decision) 2) Dishonest (using an unrelated GR to turn over the default init decision made through a backdoor you put in) 3) Goddamn slimy (for supporting this abuse) I expected better of you. DAM, I don't even know what I can suggest you do. This is a hugely hurtful thing for Ian to do. It sucks, because I did look up to you, Ian. I did respect your work, and it literally pains me to find these words. As much as I disagreed, I respected the fact you always had technical grounds. Clearly such blatent politicking tarnishes that respect, and I'd imagine this is becoming a popular point of view. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature