On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:40:17AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > So, we have a Foundation Document, or a Position Statement that's agreed > > by GR, and then can be changed by the DPL to a delegate. I don't think > > this is entirely constitutional... > The position statement really only is the "we accept a code of conduct" > part. Everything else isn't. > Maybe that means I should not put the text of the code of conduct inline > with the rest of the GR? If so, I'll happily do so. I do think it's also important to agree that the code of conduct should be enforcable in some way so there are consequences for breaking it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature