[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:40:17AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:

> > So, we have a Foundation Document, or a Position Statement that's agreed
> > by GR, and then can be changed by the DPL to a delegate. I don't think
> > this is entirely constitutional...

> The position statement really only is the "we accept a code of conduct"
> part. Everything else isn't.

> Maybe that means I should not put the text of the code of conduct inline
> with the rest of the GR? If so, I'll happily do so.

I do think it's also important to agree that the code of conduct should
be enforcable in some way so there are consequences for breaking it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: