Hi Moray, hi all, Le mardi, 12 mars 2013 21.24:15, Moray Allan a écrit : > In my view, if we want to lengthen the term of office for our > leadership roles, which could have beneficial aspects, we should do that > as part of a wider reform that reduces the concentration of roles/power > in a single person. As I see it, one way to do that (which has certainly been proposed already) would be to have a sort-of "DPL guild"⁰. It would have these properties¹: - "enough" members (start with 3 for example, but a fixed number set in the constitution) - fixed-length terms ("18 months" for example) - renewable terms - overlapping terms (more by coincidence than by enforcement) - resignation is possible per-member, at any time (so if one member resigns, a new one is elected ASATCP²) - leadership/chairman role (if needed) rotated between the elected members on a regular basis³ What do the candidates think of such a system; would it be something you would push, not push, why? Thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX ⁰ Team / Board / Committee / Whateva, the name isn't the core of the idea. ¹ Which are quite alike those of the swiss federal government ² As Soon As The Constitution Permits ³ Could also be done by decision of the "guild", for example; or not at all.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.