On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > My question was basicly if you wanted to make that change > > at that time. My interpretation is that you didn't propose > > to change it at that time, but that you would do it at some > > later time. > > > > The question was which part of the constituion this would follow. That should be "was not which". Kurt