[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amendment: automatic expiry-on-failure, to Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions



On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 06:38:30PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:52:43PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:43:16AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > AMENDMENT START
> > > ========================================================================
> > > Replace "too small" with "thought to be too small, but there is a
> > > lack of evidence about the correct level".
> > > 
> > > Replace clause c with "c) if a year has passed, starting from the 
> > > proposal of a general resolution, without any proposal receiving the
> > > required number of seconds, then this resolution expires and the
> > > required number of seconds returns to K."
> > > ========================================================================
> > > AMENDMENT END
> > 
> > Seconded.
> 
> What exactly are you seconding?  This is a proposal that modifies
> *3* of the other proposals.

Eh, not the way I read that. But, well, this amendment as applied to the
original proposal by Jorg.

-- 
<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
  -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: