Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR sponsoring
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:26:59AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:01:38AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:10:49PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > PROPOSAL START
> > > =====================================================================
> > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > > Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
> > > discussion and/or voting of some resolutions, there is no evidence that
> > > changing the number of sponsors (seconds) for GR proposals or amendments
> > > will help solve those problems. Instead, by making it harder to propose
> > > general resolutions or amendments, it might make it harder to improve
> > > imperfect resolutions, or to add valuable options to a ballot.
> > >
> > > Therefore the Debian project reaffirms the current requirements for the
> > > sponsoring (seconding) of GR proposals or amendments, and for overruling
> > > of delegates.
> > > =====================================================================
> > > PROPOSAL END
> >
> > Seconded.
> >
> > I realise there are already sufficient seconds to make this a valid
> > option on the ballot, but it seems reasonable to see what it actually
> > takes to get to the 15 or 30 or so seconds being proposed before voting.
> > (From the vote.d.o page I gather there's currently 8 seconds for the
> > proposal to require 2Q seconds, and 5 for Q seconds)
>
> It's now at:
> 2Q: 9
> Q: 7
> Keep current: 7
To be complete, there is also:
- Bill Allombert's simular proposal with 1 second.
- MJ Ray's proposal about the expiry-on-failure with 1 second
- Neil McGovern's s/K/Q/ with 1 second
Kurt
Reply to: