Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR sponsoring

[Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Lucas Nussbaum writes ("[Amendment] Reaffirm current requirements for GR sponsoring"):
> I hope that Bill Allombert will rescind his own amendment. If he chooses
> to keep it, I might rescind this one instead (we don't need two "keep
> things as is" options on the ballot).

I hereby second Lucas's amendment.

Ian.

> PROPOSAL START
> =====================================================================
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project. While over those years, some problems have arised during the
> discussion and/or voting of some resolutions, there is no evidence that
> changing the number of sponsors (seconds) for GR proposals or amendments
> will help solve those problems.  Instead, by making it harder to propose
> general resolutions or amendments, it might make it harder to improve
> imperfect resolutions, or to add valuable options to a ballot.
> 
> Therefore the Debian project reaffirms the current requirements for the
> sponsoring (seconding) of GR proposals or amendments, and for overruling
> of delegates.
> =====================================================================
> PROPOSAL END
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBScq0xsMWjroj9a3bAQLo7gP+IVG9v0C5Nh4SR9+/9NnZHqmndk+V5ocZ
H5WFM0TC3yjl2tCVHxEMCvw6IWJS4kKL4WwCDaH/I9XJ4bNAa8V/Fg3E82Bbdzrh
68TUr8urO7kUZwh5ZFs5wOLUZKlqTaAPKe0wTLU6GSThptHix9yLA23F4E6dxlGd
c/Dk1EwwDxM=
=kIlY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----