Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

[Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>]

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:51:37PM +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> >
> >PROPOSAL START
> >========================================================================
> >General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> >Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
> >to initiate one are too small.
> >
> >Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> > a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
> >    a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
> >    as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
> >    period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
> >    developers to sponsor the resolution.
> > c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
> >
> >(Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
> >========================================================================
> >PROPOSAL END
> 
> Assuming that you'll provide explicit diffs for the constitution:
> 
> Seconded.

I'm not really sure how to interprete this.  Does this mean you'll
only second it after he changes the proposal to include the diff?


Kurt