[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions



On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:47:57PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
>PROPOSAL START
>========================================================================
>General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
>Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements
>to initiate one are too small.
>
>Therefore the Debian project resolves that
> a) The constitution gets changed to not require K developers to sponsor
>    a resolution, but floor(2Q). [see §4.2(1)]
> b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)],
>    as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting
>    period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q)
>    developers to sponsor the resolution.
> c) the definition of K gets erased from the constitution. [§4.2(7)]
>
>(Numbers in brackets are references to sections in the constitution).
>========================================================================
>PROPOSAL END

Assuming that you'll provide explicit diffs for the constitution:

Seconded.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: