On Sat Mar 14 14:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I'm currently inclined to interprete it so that anything that > seems to modify an interpretation will require an explicit change > in some document. But I'm not sure it's in my power to refuse > an option that doesn't do so. So that would be option 2 above. Yeah, this is what I think too, but Manoj got a lot of flack about it, hence why I want to make it explicit. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature