Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > For instance, it would be very useful to know whether the current > secretary would consider Peter's proposal on firmware to require super > majority or not. If the secretary does _not_ think it will imply > supermajority, it would be pointless to delay the vote on the basis of > that. As some people already have said, making all the choices in such a ballot modify the Foundation Documents would make the supermajority problems in the previous vote go away, and would more likely solve this issue once and for all (or probably not only affecting the current release or whatever), as it would be written in the FDs. Emilio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature