On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 04:20:21PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Continuing discussions about the supermajority requirements before > going to the firmware is probably not a bad idea. I see the point of asking the supermajority vote to be dealt with before voting on firmware. However, I don't see it as necessary. The discussion about the issues of supermajority was born from a ballot badly dealt with; the errors of that ballot have already been acknowledged and is pointless to reiterate here. Still, it is very well possible that we can, this time, vote on the firmware issues without as many problems as before. For instance, it would be very useful to know whether the current secretary would consider Peter's proposal on firmware to require super majority or not. If the secretary does _not_ think it will imply supermajority, it would be pointless to delay the vote on the basis of that. So, Kurt, what's your take on it? Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature