Re: Amendment: automatic expiry-on-failure, to Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
With thanks to suggestions from Wouter Verhelst and Russ Allbery, I
present a redrafted amendment. Seeing as none of the proposers have
responded, I ask for seconds. The rationale remains the same: almost
no evidence has been presented for Q or 2Q or pretty much anything
else we've not tried, while linking seconding to population size risks
making "the developers by way of a GR" impotent, so let's keep a
safeguard escape route.
Replace "too small" with "thought to be too small, but there is a
lack of evidence about the correct level".
Replace clause c with "c) if a year has passed, starting from the
proposal of a general resolution, without any proposal receiving the
required number of seconds, then this resolution expires and the
required number of seconds returns to K."
This amendment may be combined with any of the proposal in
Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
or the amendments in
Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
Message-id: <[🔎] 20090322131519.GH4554@halon.org.uk>
and I suggest that their ballot lines be the same as for the proposal or
amended proposals with "with expiry clause" appended.
Thanks for reading,
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----