[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Amendment: automatic expiry-on-failure, to Proposal: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:37:02PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> ========================================================================
> Replace "too small" with "thought to be too small, but there is a
> lack of evidence about the correct level".
> Replace clause c with "c) if general resolutions are proposed but none
> receives the required number of seconds in a year, this resolution
> expires and the required number of seconds returns to K."
> ========================================================================

Seconded, in principle, but it has some issues:
- What if no GRs are proposed in the first year?
- You should probably make it explicit that DPL elections do not count

<Lo-lan-do> Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
  -- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: