On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 09:57:39PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> This proposal does not come from an abuse to the GR process, but to
> generalized frustration about the way 2008_002 and specially
> 2008_003 were handled.
Uhm, I can understand the frustration argument about 2008_003 (even
though it is not a good argument per se to restrict access to the GR
mechanism), but not the one about 2008_002. The topic was of course
confrontational and not a pleasant one, but what was controversial
about the *handling* of that GR?
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature