[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Amendment] Reaffirm the GR process

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > 
> > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR.  It is
> > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> > changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion.  I hope the Secretary
> > will fix this.
> I think the title is also not the best one and just used Joerg's
> title.
> What about:
> General Resolution sponsorship requirements

Sounds good to me.

Thank you

Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

Reply to: