[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG

MJ Ray <mjr@phonecoop.coop> writes:

> Did the delegates decide this particular matter or was Bug #495721
> merely a summary of current practice?  The statement there seemed
> incomplete in significant ways.

The ftpmaster statement about the AGPL was remarkably explicit.

    recently we, your mostly friendly Ftpmaster and -team, have been asked
    about an opinion about the AGPL in Debian.

    The short summary is: We think that works licensed under the AGPL can
    go into main. (Provided they don't have any other problems).

I'm not sure what requirements you have, but I have a hard time imagining
much done in the project that is more obviously a delegate decision.

> Also, I think we should let the secretary to decide if a GR proposal
> modifies some foundation document, overrides a delegate decision, or
> requires amendment to be valid, rather than withholding seconds.

I don't think the secretary currently has that power under the

Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply to: