Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG
MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Did the delegates decide this particular matter or was Bug #495721
> merely a summary of current practice? The statement there seemed
> incomplete in significant ways.
The ftpmaster statement about the AGPL was remarkably explicit.
recently we, your mostly friendly Ftpmaster and -team, have been asked
about an opinion about the AGPL in Debian.
The short summary is: We think that works licensed under the AGPL can
go into main. (Provided they don't have any other problems).
I'm not sure what requirements you have, but I have a hard time imagining
much done in the project that is more obviously a delegate decision.
> Also, I think we should let the secretary to decide if a GR proposal
> modifies some foundation document, overrides a delegate decision, or
> requires amendment to be valid, rather than withholding seconds.
I don't think the secretary currently has that power under the
Russ Allbery (email@example.com) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>