Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG
> Of course, had the FTP master rejected packages under the AGPL from the
> archive, I would not have bothered with a GR. However I would like this
> GR to be considered independently of the FTP master resolution. They are
> not the target, the AGPL is.
It is not seperate. You do want to override a decision from us, which is
that the AGPL is fine for packages in our archive. You do want Debian to
decide that this is not true and the AGPL is not ok.
Fine, have it, if you find seconders, but clearly name it after what it
>A developer contacts you and asks you to met for a keysign. What is
>your response and why?
Do you like beer? When do we meet? [...]