Re: GR proposal: the AGPL does not meet the DFSG
Bill Allombert <Bill.Allombert@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes:
> I proposed my resolution explicitly under 4.1.5, not under 4.1.3. The
> purpose of this GR is to take a public stance whether or not the AGPL
> meet DFSG.
> I am pretty confident that the FTP master will comply with the outcome
> of such determination, and I think it would be uselessly confrontational
> to draft it as overriding them.
I believe that you're mistaken in your belief that it's less
confrontational to override their decision without saying so. However, I
will defer to the FTP team; if they see this distinction and agree with
it, I withdraw my objection.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>