On Sat Mar 14 12:51, Luk Claes wrote: > Hmm, I thought the reason we delayed it till after the release is so we > could discuss things and only when we have a consensus to change or seem > to have clear options, to get to a vote. > > As I saw your name mentioned next to the constitutional issues, I > thought you were going to tackle one point after another to lead the > discussions and not just to try to defend your own views? Well, I was going to, but there's no discussion to lead! The main thing is that I really really don't want nothing to have happened by the time we are trying to release squeeze. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature