Re: Results of the Lenny release GR
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:13:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please, could you send a new message clarifiing the situation, and your
> judgement as Secretary?
While this GR was still in the discussion period, Manoj posted
an analysis of what each option meant; and he also judged that
option 5 meant release.
On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:45:56 -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> ,----[ Proposal 5: allow Lenny to release with firmware blobs ]
> i Do we require source for firmware in main: Yes*
> ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs: No
> iii What do we do for Lenny: Release
> iV Do we modify foundation documents: No
> v Do we override foundation documents No
> * This proposal gives the binary blobs distributed in the kernel
> the benefit of doubt, and assumes they do not violate the GPL and are
> the preferred form of modification, however unlikely that is.