[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Results of the Lenny release GR

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:13:26PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> Please, could you send a new message clarifiing the situation, and your
> judgement as Secretary?

While this GR was still in the discussion period, Manoj posted
an analysis of what each option meant; and he also judged that
option 5 meant release.


On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:45:56 -0600, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> ,----[ Proposal 5: allow Lenny to release with firmware blobs ]
> ...
>    i Do we require source for firmware in main:                 Yes*
>   ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs:  No
>  iii What do we do for Lenny:                                   Release
>   iV Do we modify foundation documents:                         No
>    v Do we override foundation documents                        No
>  * This proposal gives the binary blobs distributed in the kernel
>    the benefit of doubt, and assumes they do not violate the GPL and are
>    the preferred form of modification, however unlikely that is.

Steve Cotton

Reply to: