Re: Technical committee resolution
Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Well, just to pick an example, if the TC had chosen you to deal with
>> the wordpress-in-stable issue, and you had personally decided it
>> needed to be in stable, and had done whatever work was initially
>> needed to get it into stable with security support, you'd still be
>> responsible for its security now, and the several security holes it
>> has now would be a problem that you'd be aware of, and at least be
>> worrying about if nothing else.
>
> The package in question, as problematic as it is, has an active
> maintainer
FWIW, it's orphaned since yesterday. But let's keep it in Lenny
as well, I no longer care.
> who claimed that he would do exactly this.
People claim stuff all the time. It's also Neil McGovern who
promised to do it and never did so. (Which is especially bad
since at least two people quoted this to be a reason to keep it
in their vote)
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: