On ven, 2008-02-15 at 15:50 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > I'm not so sure this is an off-by-one *error*; for example, when simple > majority is required, then a strict 50% against vs 50% in favour result > should result in the status quo being kept. A simple majority thus needs > to say "*more* than X percent of people need to agree for the vote to > pass", and it seems reasonable to give a supermajority system the same > set of rules. Definitely. > Having said that, I agree with you that it makes sense for the TC to not > require 'X + 1', since the electorate is so small anyway; I don’t understand why the previous argument wouldn’t apply to a small number of voters. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=