[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: First call for votes for the Lenny release GR

On Wed, Dec 17 2008, Loïc Minier wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>         The way that we achive such combinations using condorcet is to
>>  propose such combinations as options intheir own right; and then have
>>  people vote on the combination option along with simple options.
>  Or do separate votes...

        Separate votes on related proposals are widely open to gaming
 the system.

>>         There was no such proposal during the discussion period.
>  It was your decision to make a single ballot out of these orthogonal
>  issues, do not present the situation as being the proposers' fault.

        It is not the proposers fault in any case; it is, if anything,
 the responsibiulity of folks who wanted to vote on more than one option
 at a time, even when it was clear that the ballot was the way it is

        Secondly, I have presented my arguments why these proposals are
 all strongly related, and thus deserve to be on the same ballot for a
 fair vote. I do not see any counter arguments here.

Suicide is the sincerest form of self-criticism. Donald Kaul
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: