Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification
On Mon, Nov 17 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Josselin Mouette said:
>> Le lundi 17 novembre 2008 à 14:05 +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
>> > This is not part of my GR as proposed and seconded.
>> The Secretary made it clear that if your proposal wins, the SC *will* be
> As has been pointed out elsewhere, the Secretary's job is to interpret
> the constitution, not the SC. I'm not convinced that the secretary can
> mandate that a GR changes the SC.
I think the only way to reconcile the constitution with the GR
is to have a 3:1 vote, and subsequently to modify the foundation
document. We can't just supersede a foundation document otherwise.
Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with an international
standard? A: You get someone who makes you an offer that you can't
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C