[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposed wording for the SC modification

On Mon, Nov 17 2008, Stephen Gran wrote:

> This one time, at band camp, Josselin Mouette said:
>> Le lundi 17 novembre 2008 à 14:05 +0100, Peter Palfrader a écrit :
>> > This is not part of my GR as proposed and seconded.
>> The Secretary made it clear that if your proposal wins, the SC *will* be
>> amended.
> As has been pointed out elsewhere, the Secretary's job is to interpret
> the constitution, not the SC.  I'm not convinced that the secretary can
> mandate that a GR changes the SC.

        I think the only way to reconcile the constitution with the GR
 is to have a 3:1 vote, and subsequently to modify the foundation
 document.  We can't just supersede a foundation document otherwise.

Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with an international
standard? A: You get someone who makes you an offer that you can't
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: