Le samedi 15 novembre 2008 à 19:39 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit : > > Hm, no, the impression that I got from this discussion that at least > > several people here think the result of "Further discussion" is: > > > > i Do we require source for firmware in main: Yes > > ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs: No > > iii What do we do for Lenny: Wait > > iV Do we modify foundation documents: No > > v Do we override foundation documents No > > > > and that seems to be consistent with what Manoj is ruling about overrides > > of the SC. > > This is my reading, yes. As far as I see, the SC is pretty > clear, and leaves us no other option. It seems very convenient to decide at the same time that "further discussion" equals proposition #1 and that other propositions require 3:1 majority. This means that, if proposition #1 fails to gather 1:1 majority and other propositions fail to gather 3:1 (a very likely outcome), you get to decide that proposition #1 applies anyway. It makes me feel uneasy. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=