[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: call for seconds: on firmware

Le samedi 15 novembre 2008 à 19:39 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > Hm, no, the impression that I got from this discussion that at least
> > several people here think the result of "Further discussion" is:
> >
> >     i Do we require source for firmware in main:                 Yes
> >    ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs:  No
> >   iii What do we do for Lenny:                                   Wait
> >    iV Do we modify foundation documents:                         No
> >     v Do we override foundation documents                        No
> >
> > and that seems to be consistent with what Manoj is ruling about overrides
> > of the SC.
>         This is my reading, yes. As far as I see, the SC is pretty
>  clear, and leaves us no other option.

It seems very convenient to decide at the same time that "further
discussion" equals proposition #1 and that other propositions require
3:1 majority.

This means that, if proposition #1 fails to gather 1:1 majority and
other propositions fail to gather 3:1 (a very likely outcome), you get
to decide that proposition #1 applies anyway.

It makes me feel uneasy.
: :' :      We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'       We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-        our own. Resistance is futile.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

Reply to: