Re: Possible amendment for Debian Contributors concept
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I really dislike the negative tone of the original proposed resolution,
Me too.
Unfortunately this tone seems to be normal in Debian these days, which
is a shame.
> so I am thinking of proposing this as an alternative option.
>
> The text I'm thinking about is currently this:
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
> | not working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not
> | provided by the project with as much help as might be possible, useful
> | or required.
> | .
> | We thank Joerg Jaspert for exploring ideas on how to involve
> | contributors more closely with the project so that they can get both
> | recognition and the necessary tools to do their work.
> | .
> | We realize that the proposal posted to the debian-devel-announce
> | mailinglist is not yet finalized and may not have the support of a large
> | part of our community. We invite the DAM to further develop his ideas
> | in close coordination with other members of the project, and to present
> | a new and improved proposal on the project's mailinglists in the future,
> | at least two weeks prior to any planned implementation.
>
> This is not a call for seconds yet, but a request for comments.
> So, any changes that should be made before it gets proposed, if it will?
I'd second it as it is.
Cheers,
Bernd
- --
Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkkG7noACgkQBnqtBMk7/3mTzACfQbIH/xPAInoLyaLcVQtxRF37
IbQAn0EuVSWktyhN0wzPEpFy0V7pFMBo
=6nFL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: