On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:56:48PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org> [2008.10.27.2028 +0100]: > > [ ] Choice 1: Decision on membership reform stands until GR decided > > [ ] Choice 2: Decision on membership reform delayed until GR decided > > I don't understand the difference between those two. > At http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/10/msg00005.html, Joerg Jaspert posted a mail. There's currently a GR to reverse the decision in that mail[0]. As we've received >= 10 seconds to the GR, and the GR mentions the 'revocation-until-vote' clause of 4.2.2, the decision is suspended. A vote needs to be called to determine if this suspension stands until the GR results come in. Voting for Choice 1 means that Joerg may continue doing whatever decisions he may or may not have made until the result of the GR. Voting for Choice 2 means that he can't pursue it until the GR results are in (at a minimum). Hope this explains, Neil [0] Whether it contains any decisions or not is left as an exercise to the reader, I'm not going to make that judgement call. [1] I am *slightly* annoyed that clause 4.2.2 is being invoked at this time, it means a lot more work running votes and I'm not convinced there's anything to gain, but *shrug*. -- <h01ger> ETOOMUCHSPANISHTOOFAST
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature